Parwana
(Jyoti Swaroop, 1971)

Allegedly
based on an actual incident that ACTUALLY DID force the Indian
Railway to alter their schedule, Parwana is a stylish,
entertaining, engrossing and clever crime thriller, with the added
fascination of a youthful, pre-superstardom Amitabh Bachchan taking
on a rare negative role (I think the gap between this and his next
villain in Aankhen is something like 30 years).
The
set-up is this: Kumar Sen (Amitabh Bachchan), an artist, is in love
with Asha (Yogeeta Bali), and expects to marry her, believing that
Asha's uncle Ashok Varma (Om Prakash) has guaranteed to arrange their
match. So he is shocked to discover that Asha is in love with Rajesh
(Navin Nischol), a man she met while on a dance trip, and that Ashok
Varma has agreed to let Asha and Rajesh wed.

Kumar
doesn't do unrequited love very well – he goes all broody
possessive emo on it, and in fact Kumar refuses to accept that Asha
will never be his. He visits Ashok, trying to get him to change his
mind and get Rajesh out of the picture, but Ashok just wants Asha to
be happy. Kumar and Ashok fight, and Kumar leaves on a train bound
for Calcutta to be alone with his jealousy, leaving Ashok Varma ALIVE
AND KICKING.
But
the next day Ashok Varma is found murdered in his home, and Rajesh is
arrested – he finds the body and claims he was alerted by a
phonecall from the absent Kumar. But HOW COULD THAT BE? Kumar was on
a train at the time of the murder, and couldn't have called Rajesh?
That troubling inconsistency, and the discovery of an incriminating
letter from Ashok Varma, stating that Rajesh isn't good enough to
marry Asha, make Rajesh TOTALLY SUSPECT #1 in the police's eyes. He
proclaims his innocence, but how can Rajesh prove it was Kumar, when
Kumar was 4 hours away on a train to Calcutta at the time of the
murder?
THEREIN
LIES THE COMPELLING MYSTERY AT THE HEART OF PARWANA!
Parwana
means ''moth''. The film gets its title from a line in which Kumar
Sen (Amitabh Bachchan) likens his obsessive attraction for Asha
(Yogeeta Bali) to a moth, drawn fatally towards a flame.



It's
actually a shame that Big B didn't get the opportunity to do more
meaty, negative roles like this one, because he is awesome at it
(though I guess his Angry Young Man thing kind of employs some of the
same schtick) – the brooding, inner turmoil, bubbling up and barely
contained; he's on a slow burn for much of the film and then BOOM out
it comes.

Also:
look how handsome! Near the start of the film, especially in the
'funny disguise' song, he reminded me SO MUCH of Abhishek. The
resemblance, down to mannerisms, is so strong sometimes.
Bonus
post-interval awesomeness: the prosecutor is played by none other
than

SHATRUGHAN
SINHA!
There's
something weird going on with Shatru, in that he's not wearing pink,
orange, pink AND orange, paisley, lurid multicolour patterns, a giant
tie, enormous sunglasses or all of the above PLUS massive
bellbottoms. Also he is not carrying a gun or a walking stick. Nor is
he wearing any ridiculous jewels.
In
fact, as a respectable man of justice, he's initially devoid of his
usual swagger and peacocking. All he has are these:

GIANT
GLASSES. Naturally, Shotgun can rock them. And it's not long before
his natural swagger starts peeking through:
The
whole reason I watched this film in the first place is because it
partly inspired and is referenced throughout Johnny Gaddar,
a film that I utterly LOVED (and one I will have to rewatch now I
have seen the 'source' material). It's so obvious now just how much
JG owes to this classic – in terms of plot but also
in terms of sheer atmospheric style.
This
is definitely a classic, underappreciated gem that is worth a watch - not JUST for Big B, but because it's a well-crafted, ingenious mystery thriller.





Ness, thanks for writing about this film. I haven't seen it, and I love mysteries. I wish too that Amitabh had done more negative roles, he makes a really disturbing villain.
ReplyDeleteOooh you must watch this one! It's really good!
ReplyDelete