Yuva (Mani Ratnam, 2004)
Taking narrative inspiration from Alejandro Inarittu’s acclaimed Amores Perros (at least, that’s what it reminded me of), Yuva begins in the middle, with an accident on the Second Hoogly Bridge in Kolkatta. Three very different lives are about to intersect in a split second – Yuva (“Youth”) is the story of these three men: Lallan (Abhishek Bachchan), Michael (Ajay Devgn) and Arjun (Vivek Oberoi), how they come to be on that bridge, and how their lives change forever after that one chance meeting.


I haven’t seen many Mani Ratnam films, but the ones I HAVE seen so far, I have adored. Yuva is no exception: it’s stylish – adopting and adapting the (at the time of filming) very much in vogue ‘fragmented narrative’ structure to suit mainstream Hindi cinema, A.R. Rahman composes a suitably youthful rap and electronica influenced soundtrack, art director Sabu Cyril chooses a colour palette to match each of the main characters: Lallan is equated with red; Michael with green and Arjun with blue; it doesn’t pull its punches – it’s gritty and violent, and heartbreaking when it veers into dark territory; and there are layers and layers of weighty themes in the narrative. From dirty politics and corruption, to philosophical questions about the mutable nature of the goodness of humanity, you can watch Yuva 100 times and find juicy stuff to ponder.

It might be surprising to those of you who have seen the film that the reason I initially wanted to see it was because I hadn’t ever really seen any Vivek Oberoi movies (is that a weird reason? I can’t tell?). With a solid star cast and an experienced director, there are some fantastic, gutwrenching performances in this film, but if you’ve ever read ANYTHING about Yuva before, you’ll know that the film absolutely belongs to Abhishek Bachchan as Lallan Singh.

Totally the man.
I’ve always been an AB fan, but I CANNOT believe I haven’t seen this film until now. As the violent, conflicted Lallan, on an increasingly tragic path, Abhishek is absolutely, terrifyingly convincing and devastatingly sad.
The reason I finally watched Yuva NOW though, as you’ve probably guessed, is because it’s Deol Dhamaka and Yuva is one of the very few films I own that has Esha Deol in it. I figured it was time to give Esha a chance.
Honestly: I’m as guilty as anyone else of needlessly knocking Esha without having actually given her a fair trial – she has somehow earned something of an unofficial reputation as one of the ‘lesser’ Deols, and I’ve never had much time for her. It’s true that in this film, her role is not particularly big. The women in Yuva exist pretty much as love interests and foils to the men, who are the primary focus; the female characters serve to illustrate the features and flaws of the heroes. Of the three women: Rani Mukherjee as Sashi, Lallan’s feisty, good-hearted, doomed lover;
Kareena Kapoor as Meera, Arjun’s driven, intelligent, opinionated dream girl;
and Esha as Radhika, Michael’s French-speaking, ‘creative with the truth’, argumentative girlfriend,

Esha has by far the smallest role and struggles to make an impact with the miniscule time she has onscreen; knowing she is also in the Tamil version of the film makes me curious to see if her role is any bigger or different (particularly given my fascination with Raavan/Raavanan). But you know what? Having been led to expect that I would cringe every second that Esha opened her mouth, I was PLEASANTLY surprised.








Thanks for the review - nice to see Esha being considered without vitriol. You've also reminded me that I've heard she IS better in the Tamil version, as is the film itself, apparently.
ReplyDeleteI'm definitely going to have to seek the Tamil version out - I'm very curious to see how it differs, and whether Esha fares any better. It's interesting that she (I think?) was the only member of the Hindi cast to appear in the concurrently filmed Tamil version - maybe that's why her role in the Hindi one is quite small, if her part in the Tamil one is more substantial?
ReplyDeleteThe point is: in NO way was Esha off-putting or remotely what I would term 'bad' (as others had maybe led me to believe).
Apparently, Tamil is her first language, so that might make a difference. My biggest problem with the Hindi version (it's been a LONG time since I saw it), was Ajay as "student" leader. Although to be fair to him, he probably looked too old even when he was the right age. :)
ReplyDeleteYup. Totally felt that. And then I thought "maybe he's an adult student" to try and justify it to myself (HAHAHAHA), and also "would I rather Ajay in this role, or Aamir?"
ReplyDeleteAjay won. I did think that of the three 'couples' Ajay and Esha had the least chemistry, but then when I was thinking about how the women are really just there as foils for the men - e.g. Sashi is the conscience for Lallan, Meera is driven and decisive where Arjun is indecisive and drifting; then Esha's character has more of a point. Michael doesn't know how - or is unwilling to play the political game - he speaks his mind very bluntly and forthrightly; Radhika is shown subtly manipulating and being creative with the truth to get what she wants.
The differences in Ayutha Ezhuthu and Yuva are all pretty subtle, and I don't remember Esha's character as being really different. I'm trying to figure out if she was dubbed in Tamil, so I watched the same scene-starts at 2:00 in Hindi (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lz_wmpSKUeY)and Tamil (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3vLzp_R1yo), and her voice sounds deeper in Tamil, but who knows.
ReplyDeleteTo me one of the subtle differences is that the Tamil version seems a little bit more comfortable with sexuality, a good example is the scene I linked to, when they are roughhousing in Michael's bedroom.
@dustdevil liz OOOH the disapproving maa is the same! hmmm, based on those clips - yeah, there doesn't seem to be any radical difference. I like her with the Tamil version of "Michael" better, and just that tiny bit of chemistry (I thought Esha and Ajay seemed kind of awkward) could go a long way to making her performance look a MILLION times better in the Tamil version.
ReplyDeleteYuva is really adorable, and I think my reason for viewing it was even funnier than yours: When I was 10 or so, a "small" BW-Fan, I'd look up Movie Stills from films of my fav. actors on the internet, so I'd look at Yuva stills because of Kareena. And I knew I had to watch it because of her and Vivek (whom I loved because of Saathiya :)).
ReplyDeleteAlso, I haven't seen many Mani Ratnam films either, but anyways, he's one of my favorite directors.
@Lime(tte) I really loved Kareena and Vivek in this film - their storyline was my favourite (what can I say, I am a big soppy romantic)!
ReplyDelete